TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION, HEALTH BENEFIT, EDUCATIONAL, ELEVATOR INDUSTRY WORK PRESERVATION FUNDS, ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS ANNUITY et al v. THE ELEVATOR GUILD, INC. et al
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION, HEALTH BENEFIT, EDUCATIONAL, ELEVATOR INDUSTRY WORK PRESERVATION FUNDS, ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS ANNUITY and 401 (k) RETIREMENT PLAN |
THE ELEVATOR GUILD, INC. and CHRISTIAN GOETTING |
2:2011cv02870 |
April 29, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Delaware |
CYNTHIA M. RUFE |
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1104 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (#17) IS GRANTED AS TO DEFENDANT GOETTING'S LIABILITY. PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS, AS SET FORTH IN THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, IS GRANTED. DEFENDANTS, THE ELEVATOR GUILD, LLC AND CHRISTIAN GOETTING, ARE JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY LIABLE FOR THE REASONABLE ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS SOUGHT, IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $8,966.25. AS PLAINTIFFS HAVE NOT ADEQUATELY SUBSTANTIATED THE OTHER DAMAGES REQUESTED, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFFS MUST SUBMIT SUPPLEMENTAL DOCUMENTATION OF DAMAGES ON OR BEFORE 2/7/13, WHICH SUBMISSION MUST OUTLINE THE AMOUNTS ALLEGEDLY OWED AND THE BASIS FOR THAT CALCULATION ON A MONTH-BY-MONTH BASIS. ANY RESPONSE FROM DEFENDANTS MUST BE FILED ON OR BEFORE 2/15/13. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 1/23/13. 1/24/13 ENTERED & E-MAILED. COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE DEFENDANTS. [fdc] |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION, HEALTH BENEFIT, EDUCATIONAL, ELEVATOR INDUSTRY WORK PRESERVATION FUNDS, ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS ANNUITY et al v. THE ELEVATOR GUILD, INC. et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION, HEALTH BENEFIT, EDUCATIONAL, ELEVATOR INDUSTRY WORK PRESERVATION FUNDS, ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS ANNUITY | |
Represented By: | ROBERT P. CURLEY |
Represented By: | DAVID D. CAPUANO |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: 401 (k) RETIREMENT PLAN | |
Represented By: | ROBERT P. CURLEY |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: THE ELEVATOR GUILD, INC. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: CHRISTIAN GOETTING | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.