TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION, HEALTH BENEFIT, EDUCATIONAL, ELEVATOR INDUSTRY WORK PRESERVATION FUNDS, ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS ANNUITY et al v. THE ELEVATOR GUILD, INC. et al
Plaintiff: TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION, HEALTH BENEFIT, EDUCATIONAL, ELEVATOR INDUSTRY WORK PRESERVATION FUNDS, ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS ANNUITY and 401 (k) RETIREMENT PLAN
Defendant: THE ELEVATOR GUILD, INC. and CHRISTIAN GOETTING
Case Number: 2:2011cv02870
Filed: April 29, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Delaware
Presiding Judge: CYNTHIA M. RUFE
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1104
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 23, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (#17) IS GRANTED AS TO DEFENDANT GOETTING'S LIABILITY. PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS, AS SET FORTH IN THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, IS GRANTED. DEFENDANTS, THE ELEVATOR GUILD, LLC AND CHRISTIAN GOETTING, ARE JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY LIABLE FOR THE REASONABLE ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS SOUGHT, IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $8,966.25. AS PLAINTIFFS HAVE NOT ADEQUATELY SUBSTANTIATED THE OTHER DAMAGES REQUESTED, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFFS MUST SUBMIT SUPPLEMENTAL DOCUMENTATION OF DAMAGES ON OR BEFORE 2/7/13, WHICH SUBMISSION MUST OUTLINE THE AMOUNTS ALLEGEDLY OWED AND THE BASIS FOR THAT CALCULATION ON A MONTH-BY-MONTH BASIS. ANY RESPONSE FROM DEFENDANTS MUST BE FILED ON OR BEFORE 2/15/13. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 1/23/13. 1/24/13 ENTERED & E-MAILED. COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE DEFENDANTS. [fdc]
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION, HEALTH BENEFIT, EDUCATIONAL, ELEVATOR INDUSTRY WORK PRESERVATION FUNDS, ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS ANNUITY et al v. THE ELEVATOR GUILD, INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION, HEALTH BENEFIT, EDUCATIONAL, ELEVATOR INDUSTRY WORK PRESERVATION FUNDS, ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS ANNUITY
Represented By: ROBERT P. CURLEY
Represented By: DAVID D. CAPUANO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: 401 (k) RETIREMENT PLAN
Represented By: ROBERT P. CURLEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: THE ELEVATOR GUILD, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CHRISTIAN GOETTING
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?