PENNINGTON et al v. WELLS FARGO BANK N.A.
Plaintiff: JEFFREY PENNINGTON and NIKKI PENNINGTON
Defendant: WELLS FARGO BANK N.A. and JOHN DOE (INVESTORS) 1-10,000
Case Number: 2:2011cv02896
Filed: April 29, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Philadelphia
Presiding Judge: M. FAITH ANGELL
Presiding Judge: LOUIS H. POLLAK
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 98 ORDER THAT DEFENDANT/COUNTERCLAIMANT WELLS FARGO'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF WELLS FARGO AND AGAINST NIKKI AND JEFFREY PENNINGTON IN THE AMOUNT OF $162,844.60. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WILLIAM H. YOHN, JR ON 9/3/13. 9/4/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(mbh, )
May 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 89 ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WILLIAM H. YOHN, JR ON 5/30/13. 5/31/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(mbh, )
January 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER THAT BOTH PLAINTIFF'S AND DEFENDANT'S MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION RE DENIED. PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO DISMISS THE DEFENDANT FOR LACK OF STANDING IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. PLAINTIFFS' EXHIBIT #1 ERRONEOUSLY LABELED AS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND THEIR COMPLAINT IS DENIED WITH PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WILLIAM H. YOHN, JR ON 1/15/13. 1/16/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(mbh, )
March 22, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 34 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO REMAND THE CASE TO STATE COURT IS DENIED. DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL FURNISH PLAINTIFFS WITH A BLANK COPY OF THIS COURT'S CURRENT STANDARD FORM FOR FILING AN APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND WITH FORM USM-285. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LOUIS H. POLLAK ON 3/18/12. 3/22/12 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PARTIES AND E-MAILED.(mbh, ). (Copy of ifp application and USM-285 forms forwarded to Plaintiffs)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PENNINGTON et al v. WELLS FARGO BANK N.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JEFFREY PENNINGTON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NIKKI PENNINGTON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WELLS FARGO BANK N.A.
Represented By: CHRISTINE M. KOVAN
Represented By: STEVEN J. ADAMS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN DOE (INVESTORS) 1-10,000
Represented By: STEVEN J. ADAMS
Represented By: CHRISTINE M. KOVAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?