UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KAUR

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KAUR

Plaintiff:	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:	AMANJEET KAUR
Case Number:	2:2011cv03868
Filed:	June 14, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Philadelphia Office
County:	Delaware
Presiding Judge:	LAWRENCE F. STENGEL
Nature of Suit:	Voting
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1345
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 27, 2014	Filing 66 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 57) IS GRANTED AND DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 58) IS DENIED. THE 3/20/2008 ORDER ADMITTING DEFENDANT TO CITIZENSHIP IS REVOKED AND SET ASIDE. CERTIFICATE OF NATURALIZATION NO. 30807439 IS CANCELLED. DEFENDANT IS FOREVER RESTRAINED AND ENJOINED FROM CLAIMING ANY RIGHTS, PRIVELEGES, BENEFITS OR ADVANTAGES UNDER ANY DOCUMENT EVIDENCING UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP. DEFENDANT SHALL IMMEDIATELY SURRENDER AND DE LIVER TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, OR HIS DISIGNEE, HER CERTIFICATE OF NATURALIZATION NO. 30807439 AND ANY OTHER INDICIA OF UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, MS. KAURS UNITED STATES PASSPORT. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE AS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 1/27/2014. 1/27/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (aeg, )
July 19, 2012	Filing 22 ORDER THAT THE MOTION (DOC #11) IS DENIED, ETC. ( SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 7/19/12. ) 7/19/12 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(gn, )

Date Filed

Document Text

January 27, 2014

Filing 66 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 57) IS GRANTED AND DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 58) IS DENIED. THE 3/20/2008 ORDER ADMITTING DEFENDANT TO CITIZENSHIP IS REVOKED AND SET ASIDE. CERTIFICATE OF NATURALIZATION NO. 30807439 IS CANCELLED. DEFENDANT IS FOREVER RESTRAINED AND ENJOINED FROM CLAIMING ANY RIGHTS, PRIVELEGES, BENEFITS OR ADVANTAGES UNDER ANY DOCUMENT EVIDENCING UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP. DEFENDANT SHALL IMMEDIATELY SURRENDER AND DE LIVER TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, OR HIS DISIGNEE, HER CERTIFICATE OF NATURALIZATION NO. 30807439 AND ANY OTHER INDICIA OF UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, MS. KAURS UNITED STATES PASSPORT. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE AS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 1/27/2014. 1/27/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (aeg, )

July 19, 2012

Filing 22 ORDER THAT THE MOTION (DOC #11) IS DENIED, ETC. ( SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 7/19/12. ) 7/19/12 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(gn, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KAUR
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By:	STACEY ILENE YOUNG
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: AMANJEET KAUR
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?