MCKINNEY v. GIORLA et al
| TRACEY MCKINNEY |
| LORAELA PITTMAN, PRISONS HEALTH SERVICES, WILLIAM E. LAWTON, SAGREIYA SIDDHARTH, LOUIS GIORLA and ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES |
| 2:2011cv04188 |
| June 28, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Philadelphia |
| JUAN R. SANCHEZ |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT WILLIAM LAWTON'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 39) IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF LAWTON AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF TRACEY MCKINEY AS TO MCKINNEY'S CLAIMS AGAINST LAWTON. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 2/14/13. 2/14/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED. (jpd)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC'S MOTION TO AMEND ITS MOTION TO DISMISS TO INCLUDE ARAMARK EMPLOYEE DEFENDANT LORAELA PITTMAN AS A MOVANT (DOCUMENT 22) IS GRANTED; PLAINTIFF TRACEY L. MCKINNEY'S REQUEST FOR AN EXTE NSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO ARAMARK' MOTION TO DISMISS (DOCUMENT 17) IS DENIED AS MOOT; ARAMARK AND PITTMAN'S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOCUMENT 10) IS GRANTED. MCKINNEY'S CLAIMS AGAINST ARAMARK AND PITTMAN ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; MCKI NNEY'S CLAIM AGAINST DEFENDANT LIEUTENANT MURRAY IS DISMISSED WITHPREJUDICE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(E)(2)(B)(II) AND 1915A; MCKINNEY'S CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT LOUIS GIORLA ARE DISMISSED WITHOUTPREJUDICE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C . §§ 1915(E)(2)(B)(II) AND 1915A. IF MCKINNEY WISHES TO FILE ANAMENDED COMPLAINT ALLEGING PERSONAL INVOLVEMENT BY GIORLA IN THE ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF HISCONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, HE SHALL DO SO BY MAY 30, 2012; AND MCKINNEY'S CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, DR. SAGREIYA SIDDHARTH, AND WILLIAM LAWTON ARE NOT DISMISSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 4/30/12. 5/1/12 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PROSE, MAILED TO UNREP, E-MAILED. (er, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
