FEINGOLD et al v. LIBERTY MUTUAL GROUP et al
| ALLEN L. FEINGOLD and BARBARA QUINN |
| LIBERTY GUARD AUTO COMPANY, LIBERTY MUTUAL GROUP, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY |
| 2:2011cv05364 |
| August 25, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Philadelphia |
| HARVEY BARTLE |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
82
ORDER THAT THE MOTION OF LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY AND LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 3/7/13. 3/7/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PROSE AND E-MAILED.(ti, )
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER THAT THE MOTION OF DEFENDANTS TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF STANDING AS TO PLAINTIFF ALLEN L. FEINGOLD UNDER RULE 12(b)(1) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 4 , IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 2/28/12. 2/28/12 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(ti, )
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER THAT THE MOTION OF PLAINTIFF ALLEN L. FEINGOLD FOR DISQUALIFICATION OF DEFENSE COUNSEL MARSHALL, DENNEHEY, WARNER, COLEMAN AND GOGGIN 5 , IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 12/6/11. 12/7/11 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PARTIES AND E-MAILED.(ti, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
