COOPER v. CITY OF CHESTER et al
| CHRISTOPHER COOPER |
| DARREN ALSTON, CITY OF CHESTER, CITY OF CHESTER POLICE DEPARTMENT, STEVEN T. BYRNE and PATRICK MULLEN |
| 2:2011cv05381 |
| August 25, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Delaware |
| MICHAEL M. BAYLSON |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
72
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 29) IS DENIED AS TO COUNTS I AND II; DENIED AS TO THE ASSAULT AND BATTERY, FALSE ARREST, AND MALICIOUS PROSECUTION CLAIMS IN COUNT V. DENIED AS TO THE FALSE ARREST AND AND MALICIO US PROSECUTION CLAIMSS IN COUNT VI; GRANTED AS TO INTERNATIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTION DISTRESS AND FALSE LIGHT CLAIMS IN COUNTS V AND VI. FURTHER ORDERED PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO ADD FEDERAL CHARGES AGAINST DEFENDANT MULLEN IS DENIED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 3/11/13. 3/11/13 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )
|
|
Filing
12
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. 9) IS DENIED IN PART AND GRANTED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN. ALL CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT POLICE CHIEF ALSTON ARE DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 12/5/11. 12/6/11 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
