JOHNSON et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
| GLENDA JOHNSON and STEVEN LUCIER |
| SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC, GLAXOSMITHKLINE HOLDINGS, LLC, SANOFI-AVENTIS, U.S., L.L.C., AVANTOR PERFORMANCE MATERIALS, GRUNENTHAL U.S.A. and GRUNENTHAL GMBH |
| 2:2011cv05782 |
| September 14, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Outside the State of PA. |
| PAUL S. DIAMOND |
| P.I.: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
686
ORDERED THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED ADN ADOPTED. THE SPECIAL MASTER SHALL PROVIDE MS. CABCABIN WITH A COPY OF THE UNDER SEAL HAGENS BERMAN MOTION, THE 12/20/2017 JOINT SUBMISSION, AND THE 12/12/2017 TELECONFERNCE TRANSCRIPT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 4/25/2019. 4/26/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(sg, )
|
|
Filing
626
ORDER UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANTS SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC, GLAXOSMITHKLINE HOLDINGS (AMERICAS) INC., AND GRUNENTHAL GMBH MOTION TO REALLOCATE SPECIAL MASTER FEES AND COSTS RELATING TO HAGEN BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLC'S MO TIONS TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL (DOC. NO. 615 ), HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP'S RESPONSE (DOC. NO. 617 ), DEFENDANTS' REPLY (DOC. NO. 623 ),AND ALL RELATED SUBMISSIONS, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION (DOC. NO. 615 )IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (MEMORANDUM ORDER). SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 5/8/2018. 5/8/2018 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(rt)
|
|
Filing
506
MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT THE OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED AND THE MOTION FOR A STAY (DOC. NO. 504) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 5/19/2015. 5/19/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED. (ems)
|
|
Filing
488
MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 260) IS GRANTED FOR THE REASONS STATED IN TODAY'S MEMORANDUM OPINION. PLAINTIFF DEBRA JOHNSON'S ACTION IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, AND JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED AS TO ALL PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 4/1/2015. 4/1/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED. (ems)
|
|
Filing
483
MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT SPECIAL MASTER HANGLEY'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. NO. 414) IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SANCTIONS (DOC. NOS. 258, 281, 310) ARE GRANTED AS TO DEFENDANT GRUNTENTHAL AND HELD IN ABEYANCE AS TO THE GSK DEFENDANTS; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 3/9/2015. 3/9/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED. (ems)
|
|
Filing
372
MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 246) IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF EDMUND ANDRE'S ACTION IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED AS TO ALL PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS IN FAVOR OF ALL DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 10/16/2014. 10/16/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED. (ems)
|
|
Filing
63
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THE PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO REMAND (DOC. NO.17) IS DENIED; FOR DIVERSITY JURISDICTION PURPOSES, DEFENDANTS GLAXOSMITHKLINE HOLDINGS (AMERICAS) INC. AND GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC ARE CITIZENS OF DELAWARD ALONE; AND THE ABOVE CAPTIONED MATTER SHALL BE STAYED PENDING APPELLATE REVIEW OF THIS ORDER, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 3/29/2012. 3/29/2012 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (kk, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
