FEKETE v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, ET. AL.
| PAUL J. FEKETE |
| ROB'S TOWING & HAULING, INC. and NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION |
| AMTRAK NATIONAL RAILROAD CORPORATION and NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION |
| ROB'S TOWING & HAULING, INC. |
| DYER QUARRY, INC. |
| AMTRAK NATIONAL RAILROAD CORPORATION |
| 2:2011cv06570 |
| October 20, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Outside the State of PA. |
| BERLE M. SCHILLER |
| Other Personal Property Damage |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF AMTRAK'S MOTION FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT DYER QUARRY, INC.'S RESPONSE THERETO, AND AMTRAK'S REPLY THEREON, AND FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THE COURT MEMORANDUM DATED 8/6/2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE MOTION 51 IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE BERLE M. SCHILLER ON 8/6/12. 8/7/12 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )
|
|
Filing
12
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF IS GRANTED LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT ON OR BEFORE 12/6/11. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE CERTAIN AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE BERLE M. SCHILLER ON 11/16/11. 11/16/11 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO UNREP, E-MAILED.(fdc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
