MYERS v. ASTRUE
Plaintiff: SUSAN ANN MYERS
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Case Number: 2:2011cv07255
Filed: November 21, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: York
Presiding Judge: JUAN R. SANCHEZ
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER THAT REPORT & RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED & ADOPTED. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO TRANSFER THIS MATTER TO THE U.S.D.C. FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANA; & THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 1/11/13. 1/17/13 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MYERS v. ASTRUE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SUSAN ANN MYERS
Represented By: JANE MULLER-PETERSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?