ROBERTSHAW v. PUDLES et al
Plaintiff: BARBARA ROBERTSHAW
Defendant: GARY F. PUDLES and ANSWERNET, INC.
Case Number: 2:2011cv07353
Filed: November 29, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Montgomery
Presiding Judge: THOMAS N. ONEILL
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 243 ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO HOLD PLAINTIFF IN CONTEMPT OF COURT (DOC. NO. 240) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 6/6/2014. 6/6/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (aeg, )
May 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 236 ORDER THAT THE EMERGENCY MOTIONS FOR A STAY PENDING APPEAL ARE HEREBY GRANTED, AND PLAINTIFF SHALL TAKE NO FURTHER ACTIONS THAT ARE PERMITTED BY THE COURT'S ORDERS DATED 8/5/2013, AND 5/6/2014, PENDING DISPOSITION OF DEFENDANTS' AND CERIDA'S APPEALS TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 5/15/2014. 5/15/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )
May 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 218 ORDER THAT CERIDA INVESTMENT CORPORATION'S MOTION TO INTERVENE IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 5/6/2014. 5/6/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )
August 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 176 MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 8/5/2013. 8/5/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED (tomg, )
March 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 117 MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT PUDLES'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 95) IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT ANSWERNET'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 94) IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THA T BABJAK'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 104) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS FOLLOWS: ROBERTSHAW'S NEGLIGENCE CLAIM AGAINST BABJAK IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; BABJAK'S MOTION IS DENIED AS TO THE FRAUD AND BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY CLAIMS AGAINST HER; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 3/20/2013. 3/20/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (ems)
February 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 113 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL IS HEREBY GRANTED BUT LIMITED IN SCOPE TO ONLY THOSE DOCUMENTS PROVIDED TO G^3 BY ANSWERNET FROM JANUARY 1, 2011 THROUGH THE PRESENT. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE L. FELIPE RESTREPO ON 2/11/2013. 2/12/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO UNREP, E-MAILED.(kp, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ROBERTSHAW v. PUDLES et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BARBARA ROBERTSHAW
Represented By: F. EMMETT FITZPATRICK, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GARY F. PUDLES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANSWERNET, INC.
Represented By: GEOFFREY PAUL HULING
Represented By: MAURICE R. MITTS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?