MCLUCAS v. KINDRED HEALTHCARE, INC. et al
| CHRISTIN MCLUCAS |
| KINDRED HEALTHCARE, INC., KINDRED HOSPITALS EAST, LLC and JOSEPH LACY |
| 2:2011cv07496 |
| December 7, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Chester |
| GENE E.K. PRATTER |
| Civil Rights: Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (DOCKET NO. 24) IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CSE FOR ALL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 9/5/13. 9/6/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF AND E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(rab, )
|
|
Filing
22
ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY, WILLIAM WILSON'S, MOTION TO WITHDRAW (DOCKET NO. 12) IS GRANTED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL REMOVE THIS CASE FROM SUSPENSE STATUS TO ACTIVE STATUS. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL TERMINATE MR. WILSON AS PLAINTIF F'S COUNSEL OF RECORD AND CHANGE THE DOCKET TO REFLECT PLAINTIFF'S PRO SE STATUS. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL ADD PLAINTIFF'S LAST KNOWN ADDRESS TO THE DOCKET AND MAIL A COPY OF THIS ORDER TO HIM. THE DEADLINES SET FORTH IN THIS ORDER SHALL BE PUT IN PLACE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 4/15/13. 4/15/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF AND E-MAILED.(rab, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
