ZHAO et al v. SKINNER ENGINE COMPANY et al
Plaintiff: XIA ZHAO and DAVID EHRMANN
Defendant: SKINNER ENGINE COMPANY, FRANCIS SHAW & CO, LTD., FRANCIS SHAW CABLE MACHINERY, POLYMER MACHINERY CO., BARWELL POLYMER MACHINERY CO., FARRELL CORPORATION and SHAR SYSTEMS, INC.
Case Number: 2:2011cv07514
Filed: December 7, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Chester
Presiding Judge: JAN E. DUBOIS
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury- Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 129 ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 98 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE MOTION IS GRANTED AND JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF FARREL CORPORATION A/K/A HF MIXING GROUP AND HF RUBBER MACHINERY, INC. AND AGAINST XIA ZHAO AND DAVID EHRMANN. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF FARREL CORPORATION A/K/A HF MIXING GROUP AND HF RUBBER MACHINERY, INC. AND AGAINST FRANCIS SHAW & CO., (MANCHESTER) LTD. ON ALL OF ITS CROSSCLAIMS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WILLIAM H. YOHN, JR ON 12/9/13. 12/11/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO UNREP AND E-MAILED.(ti, )
November 8, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 68 ORDER THAT WITH RESPECT TO THE ALLEGED BREACH OF AN EXPRESS WARRANTY IN COUNT III, THE DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED AND THAT CLAIM IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. FRANCIS SHAW & CO., LTD. AND FRANCIS SHAW CABLE MACHINERY ARE DISMISSED F ROM THIS SUIT FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISIDICTION. HOWEVER THIS DISMISSAL IS WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO PLAINTIFFS' RIGHT TO CONDUCT DISCOVERY. THE REMAINDER OF THE FRANCIS SHAW DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS UNDER FEDERAL RULES OF CIVL PROCEDURE 12(b)(2) AND 12(b)(6) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WILLIAM H. YOHN, JR ON 11/8/12. 11/8/12 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO UNREP AND E-MAILED.(ti, )
May 16, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 42 MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS XIA ZHAO AND DAVID EHRMANN'S MOTION TO REMAND (DOC. NO. 13) IS DENIED. FRANCIS SHAW IS GRANTED LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITHIN 10 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WILLIAM H. YOHN, JR ON 5/16/2012. 5/17/2012 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, MAILED AND E-MAILED; AND MAILED TO UNREP. (ems) Modified on 5/17/2012 (afm, ).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ZHAO et al v. SKINNER ENGINE COMPANY et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: XIA ZHAO
Represented By: ROBERT WILLIAM THOMAS, JR.
Represented By: KENNETH F. FULGINITI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DAVID EHRMANN
Represented By: KENNETH F. FULGINITI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SKINNER ENGINE COMPANY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FRANCIS SHAW & CO, LTD.
Represented By: PAUL K. LEARY, JR.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FRANCIS SHAW CABLE MACHINERY
Represented By: PAUL K. LEARY, JR.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: POLYMER MACHINERY CO.
Represented By: VERONICA W. SALTZ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BARWELL POLYMER MACHINERY CO.
Represented By: VERONICA W. SALTZ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FARRELL CORPORATION
Represented By: BRADLEY D. REMICK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SHAR SYSTEMS, INC.
Represented By: JEFFREY W. MCDONNELL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?