BUTLER v. DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE OF PHILADELPHIA et al
CALVIN BUTLER |
PUBLIC DEFENDER OFFICE, CARBERRY, DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, R. SETH WILLIAMS and KEVIN HARDEN |
2:2011cv07891 |
December 29, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Philadelphia |
THOMAS N. ONEILL |
Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 31 ORDER THAT THE MOTION IS GRANTED AND PLFF'S COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 10/31/13. 10/31/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(fb) |
Filing 5 ORDER THAT: LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED; PLFF SHALL PAY THE FULL FILING FEE OF $350 PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. SEC. 1915(b). THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO SEND A COPY OF THIS ORDER TO THE SUPERINTENDENT OF THE STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT MERCER; PLFF'S CLAIMS AGAINST ALL DEFTS EXCEPT FOR THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, AS WELL AS HIS CLAIMS FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, ARE DISMISSED; ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS ON PLFF'S REMAINING CLAIMS ARE STAYED UNTIL PLFF INFORMS THE CO URT THAT HIS CRIMINAL CASES HAVE BEEN RESOLVED; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL TRANSFER THIS CASE TO THE CIVIL SUSPENSE FILE AND MARK THE CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 2/14/12. 2/14/12 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE.(fb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.