MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INC. v. MILNES

Justia Dockets & Filings Third Circuit Pennsylvania Eastern District MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INC. v. MILNES

MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INC. v. MILNES

Plaintiff:	MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INC.
Defendant:	JAMES A. MILNES
Case Number:	2:2011mc00260
Filed:	November 2, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Philadelphia Office
County:	Philadelphia
Presiding Judge:	R. BARCLAY SURRICK
Nature of Suit:	Other
Cause of Action:	Motion for Confirmation of Arbitration Award
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 8, 2014	Filing 18 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT RESPONDENT'S CROSS MOTION TO VACATE APPLICATION/PETITION IS DENIED. PETITIONER'S PETITION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD AND FOR ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF MERRILL LYNCH, PIER CE, FENNER & SMITH INC. AND AGAINST JAMES A. MILNES AS FOLLOWS: COMPENSATORY DAMAGES: $134,204.50, INTEREST: $18,018.72, ATTORNEYS' FEES: $81,758.21. TOTAL JUDGMENT: $233,981.43. RESPONDENT SHALL PAY INTEREST ON THE AWARD AT THE RATE OF SIX PERCENT FROM THE DATE OF THE PANEL'S AWARD UNTIL THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT IN THIS CASE AND THEN AT THE RATE ESTABLISHED BY 28 USC SECTION 1961. RESPONDENT SHALL PAY ALL ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS INCURRED BY PETITIONER IN OPPOSI NG RESPONDENT'S CROSS MOTION TO VACATE APPLICATION/PETITION. PETITIONER SHALL SUBMIT AN ITEMIZED LIST OF ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS FOR REVIEW WITHIN 10 DAYS OF THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 4/8/14. 4/9/14 ENTERED & E-MAILED. COPY FAXED BY CHAMBERS.(fdc)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 8, 2014

Filing 18 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT RESPONDENT'S CROSS MOTION TO VACATE APPLICATION/PETITION IS DENIED. PETITIONER'S PETITION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD AND FOR ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF MERRILL LYNCH, PIER CE, FENNER & SMITH INC. AND AGAINST JAMES A. MILNES AS FOLLOWS: COMPENSATORY DAMAGES: $134,204.50, INTEREST: $18,018.72, ATTORNEYS' FEES: $81,758.21. TOTAL JUDGMENT: $233,981.43. RESPONDENT SHALL PAY INTEREST ON THE AWARD AT THE RATE OF SIX PERCENT FROM THE DATE OF THE PANEL'S AWARD UNTIL THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT IN THIS CASE AND THEN AT THE RATE ESTABLISHED BY 28 USC SECTION 1961. RESPONDENT SHALL PAY ALL ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS INCURRED BY PETITIONER IN OPPOSI NG RESPONDENT'S CROSS MOTION TO VACATE APPLICATION/PETITION. PETITIONER SHALL SUBMIT AN ITEMIZED LIST OF ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS FOR REVIEW WITHIN 10 DAYS OF THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 4/8/14. 4/9/14 ENTERED & E-MAILED. COPY FAXED BY CHAMBERS.(fdc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INC. v. MILNES
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INC.
Represented By:	AMY M. FRITSKY
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: JAMES A. MILNES
Represented By:	JOHN E. MACDONALD
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?