GIBISON v. KERESTAS et al
| THOMAS GIBISON |
| JOHN KERESTAS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA |
| 2:2012cv00200 |
| January 17, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Philadelphia |
| ANITA B. BRODY |
| L. FELIPE RESTREPO |
| Habeas Corpus: (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
ORDER (EXPLANATION, ECF NO. 54) - UPON CAREFUL AND INDEPENDENT CONSIDERAITON OF THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND THE PARTIES' BRIEFS AND RELATED FILINGS, AND AFTER REVIEW OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE LYNNE A. SITARSKI'S REPOR T AND RECOMMENDATION AND PETITIOENR'S OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED..... SIGNED BY HONORABLE ANITA B. BRODY ON 1/3/2017. 14/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES VIA ECF.(mo, )
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER THAT THE REPORT RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BE STAYED AND HELD IN ABEYANCE WHILE PETITIONER LITIGATES HIS PCRA PETITION IN THE STATE COURTS; THE CLERK OF THE COURT IS TO RETURN THE STATE COURT RECORD TO THE STATE COURTS, ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ANITA B. BRODY ON 4/23/14. 4/24/14 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
