DONOHUE v. REGIONAL ADJUSTMENT BUREAU INC. et al
MEGHAN DONOHUE |
REGIONAL ADJUSTMENT BUREAU INC., ENTERPRISE RECOVERY SYSTEMS, INC., JOHN DOE1, JANE DOE1 and PHEAA |
2:2012cv01460 |
March 23, 2012 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Bucks |
THOMAS N. ONEILL |
Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 39 ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANT ENTERPRISE RECOVERY SYSTEMS'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 15 AND PLAINTIFF MEGHAN DONOHUE'S RESPONSE THERETO 19 IT IS ORDERED THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED AS TO COUNT I; GRANTED AS COUNT I, PLAINTIFF IS GRANTED LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDMENT TO HER SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT ON OR BEFORE 4/29/2013; AND DENIED AS TO COUNT II, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 3/28/13. 3/29/13 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, ) |
Filing 36 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT BY DEFENDANTS PHEAA AND THE PHEAA INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS' (#20) IS GRANTED AND COUNT I OF THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT ASSERTING VIOLATIONS OF THE FDCPA IS DISMISSED. BE CAUSE THE REMAINING CLAIMS AGAINST PHEAA AND THE PHEAA ARE INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS AND ARE STATE LAW CLAIMS THE COURT DECLINES TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER COUNTS II AND III AND THOSE CLAIMS ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 2/19/13. 2/19/13 ENTERED & E-MAILED.[fdc] |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.