DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHISED RESTAURANTS, LLC et al v. CLAUDIA I, LLC et al
| DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHISED RESTAURANTS, LLC, DD IP HOLDER LLC, BASKIN-ROBBINS FRANCHISED RESTAURANTS, LLC and DB REAL ESTATE ASSETS I, LLC |
| CLAUDIA I, LLC, MANFRED P. MAROTTA and LYNN K. MAROTTA |
| MANFRED P. MAROTTA, CLAUDIA I, LLC and LYNN K. MAROTTA |
| DB REAL ESTATE ASSETS I, LLC, DD IP HOLDER LLC, DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHISED RESTAURANTS, LLC and BASKIN-ROBBINS FRANCHISED RESTAURANTS, LLC |
| SPRING HILL REALTY, INC. |
| CLAUDIA I, LLC, MANFRED P. MAROTTA and LYNN K. MAROTTA |
| 2:2012cv02010 |
| April 17, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Outside the State of PA. |
| LAWRENCE F. STENGEL |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
133
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFFS AND AGAINST DEFENDANTS CLAUDIA I, LLC, LYNNE K. MAROTTA, MANFRED P. MAROTTA IN THE AMOUNT OF $212,724.57 (JUDGMENT ON THE MERITS) PLUS $203,803.34 (ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS), FOR A TOTAL OF $416,527.91. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD A. MCHUGH ON 12/12/14. 12/12/14 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
|
|
Filing
126
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THE DUNKIN' PARTIES AND SPRING HILL REALTY, INC. ARE DIRECTED TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDA SUMMARIZING AND DOCUMENTING ANY CLAIMS FOR HER COUNSEL FEES WITHIN 14 DAYS, AND DEFENDANTS CLAUDIA I, ET. AL. SHALL FILE RESPONSIVE MEMORANDA WITHIN 14 DAYS THEREAFTER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD A. MCHUGH ON 10/20/14. 10/21/14 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
|
|
Filing
89
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS' AND THIRD PARTY DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS (#83) IS DENIED; PLAINTIFFS' AND THIRD PARTY DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (#6 7) IS GRANTED AS TO COUNTS I, II, IV, VI AND VIII; SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS ALSO GRANTED IN FAVOR OF THIRD PARTY DEFENDANT SPRING HILL REALTY, INC. AS TO COUNTS I AND II; PLAINTIFFS' AND THIRD PARTY DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (#67) IS DENIED AS TO COUNTS III AND V; COUNTS I, II, IV, VI AND VIII ARE DISMISSED IN THEIR ENTIRETY; AND THE CASE IS RE-REFERRED TO THE HON. HENRY S. PERKIN FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONDUCTING A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 2/10/14. 2/10/14 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
|
|
Filing
82
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THIRD PARTY DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT (43) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 7/15/13. 7/16/13 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
|
|
Filing
71
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 50 IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED DEFENDANTS ARE ENJOINED FROM HOLDING THEMSELVES OUT AS AUTHORIZED DUNKIN' DONUTS AND BASKIN-ROBBINS BRAND FRANCHISEES AND FROM OC CUPYING THE BRANDED SUBLEASED PREMISES LOCATED AT 505 OLD YORK ROAD, JENKINTOWN, PA 19046. THAT DEFENDANTS SHALL SURRENDER THE PREMISES AT 505 OLD YORK ROAD, JENKINTOWN, PA TO PLAINTIFFS WITHIN 48 HOURS IN A MANNER SUGGESTED BY PLAINTIFFS TO MINIMIZE CUSTOMER DISRUPTION, AND CEASE AND DESIST OPERATION OF THE DUNKIN' DONUTS AND BASKIN-ROBBINS FRANCHISE AT THE PREMISES AT THE TIME OF SURRENDER, UNTIL FURTHER ORDER OF THIS COURT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 5/16/13. 5/17/13 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
