KNOX v. HERMAN GEREL, LLP et al
| THOMAS J. KNOX |
| HERMAN GEREL, LLP and UNITEDHEALTHCARE, INC. |
| 2:2012cv02238 |
| April 25, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Philadelphia |
| R. BARCLAY SURRICK |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
71
MEMORANDUM ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION (DOC. NO. 46 ), IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED ON COUNT I OF PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT, AND THE COURT HEREBY DECLARES THAT NO ATTORNEY FEES OR COSTS ARE OWED TO DEFENDANT HERMAN GEREL, LLP BY PLAINTIFF IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY UNDER THE TERMS OF THE 7/21/2004 RETAINER AGREEMENT. COUNTS I-IV OF DEFENDANT HERMAN GEREL, LLP'S COUNTERCLAIM AGAINST PLAINTIFF THOMAS J. KNOX ARE DISMISSED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 1/7/2016. 1/7/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES FAXED BY CHAMBERS; E-MAILED.(amas)
|
|
Filing
44
MEMORANDUM ORDER THAT DEFENDANT UNITED HEALTHCARE INC.'S MOTIONS TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AND PLAINTIFF'S CROSS-CLAIM ARE GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, AS OUTLINED HEREIN. DEFENDANT UNITED HEALTHCARE INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT HERMAN GEREL'S CROSS-CLAIM IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 6/24/2014. 6/25/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED, FAXED BY CHAMBERS.(amas)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
