ALLEN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA COMMON PLEAS et al
| DAVID ERIC ALLEN |
| CHIEF OFFICE OF CLERK COURT, MICHEAL JOHN, ESQ., RICHARD WINTER, ESQ., COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA COMMON PLEAS, COURT MONTGOMERY COUNTY, GENOVESE and PUBLIC DEFENDER ASSOCIATION |
| 2:2012cv02649 |
| May 15, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Luzerne |
| JAMES KNOLL GARDNER |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM/ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF DAVID ERIC ALLEN, #HK-2698, SHALL PAY IN INSTALLMENTS THE FULL FILING FEE OF $350.00. BASED ON THE FINANCIAL INFOR MATION PROVIDED BY PLAINTIFF, AN INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE OF $19.08 IS ASSESSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF'S CIVL RIGHTS COMPLAINT FILED MAY 15, 2012 IS DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF'S CIVIL RIGHTS COMP LAINT FILED JUNE 5, 2012 IS DISMISSED, AND THAT THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO SEND A COPY OF THIS ORDER TO THE SUPERINTENDENT OF THE STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT DALLAS, PA, AND THAT THIS CASE SHALL REMAIN CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAMES KNOLL GARDNER ON 7/30/12. 8/7/12 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE' AND SUPERINTENDENT OF DALLAS. ( ky, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
