UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PATTERSON et al
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| RONALD D. PATTERSON, REDI-CORP OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA and AEROPLATE CORP. |
| 2:2012cv03285 |
| June 11, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Montgomery |
| R. BARCLAY SURRICK |
| Miller Act |
| 40 U.S.C. ยง 270 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
ORDER THAT PLFF'S REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLFF CONSTRUCTION HARDWARE, INC. & AGAINST DEFTS AEROPLATE CORP. & RONALD PATTERSON IN THE AMOUNT OF $253,083.84, ETC. PLFF'S REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF FEES & COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FILING OF THE MOTION FOR SANCTIONS IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 6/10/14. 6/11/14 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER THAT DEFTS' MOTION TO OPEN AND/OR STRIKE THE DEFAULT JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. THE CLERK SHALL SET ASIDE THE DEFAULTS AGAINST DEFTS RONALD D. PATTERSON, REDI-CORP. OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA, & AEROPLATE CORP. PLFF'S REQUESTS FOR ENTRY OF DEFAU LT JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFTS & PLFF'S CROSS MOTION TO ENTER DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFTS ARE DISMISSED AS MOOT. DEFTS' PETITION TO STAY IS DENIED. PLFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY IS GRANTED, ETC.SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 9/24/13. 9/25/13 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
