BROWN v. PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC. et al
| ALTON D. BROWN |
| MIKE WENERDWICZ, DORINA VARNER, WENDY SHAYLOR, LAUREL HARRY, FELIPE ARIAS, ROBERT BLATT, M. COACHI, RICHARD KOSIEROWSKI, RICHARD STEFANIC, B. MARSH, JOSEPH C. KOSZNIK and PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC. |
| 2:2012cv03578 |
| June 25, 2012 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Montgomery |
| EDUARDO C. ROBRENO |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
91
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ARE OVERRULED; THE MEDICAL DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO RULE 41(b) (DOC. NO. 45) IS DENIED; THE MEDICAL D EFENDANTS' RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO RULE 12(b)(6) IS GRANTED; PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY (DOC. NO. 37) MOTION FOR DISCOVERY HEARING AND SANCTIONS (DOC. NO. 40), MOTION TO STRIKE (DOC. NO. 41) AND REQUEST FOR A COURT ORDER (DOC. NO. 45) ARE DENIED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 11/20/13. 11/20/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED. (jpd)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS HEREBY APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE PARIES' OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED, THE MEDICAL DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS IS DNEIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS FOR TRO AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIO N ARE DENIED AS MOOT, PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. THE MATTER IS HEREBY REFERRED TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE RUETER FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE CASE SHOULD BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 4/22/2013. 4/22/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, MAILED TO PRO SE, E-MAILED.(kp, )
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL TIME TO SERVE CORRECTIONS DEFENDANTS, AND FOR ORDER REQUIRING MARSHAL TO SERVE SAME DEFENDANTS (DOC. NO. 17) ("THE MOTION"), SAID MOTION IS GRANTED. ACCORDIN GLY, PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS, AS OUTLINED HEREIN, SUFFICIENTLY INVOKE THE IMMINENT DANGE EXCEPTION TO THE THREE STRIKES RULE AND PLAINTIFF MAY PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS J. RUETER ON 2/21/2013. 2/21/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(amas)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
