COTTMAN TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS, LLC v. HOOVER et al

Plaintiff: COTTMAN TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS, LLC
Defendant: RICHARD HOOVER and COUNTYLINE TRANSMISSION, LLC
Case Number: 2:2012cv03631
Filed: June 28, 2012
Court: Pennsylvania Eastern District Court
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Montgomery
Presiding Judge: CYNTHIA M. RUFE
Nature of Suit: Franchise
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: COTTMAN TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS, LLC v. HOOVER et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: COTTMAN TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS, LLC
Represented By: WILLIAM B. JAMESON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RICHARD HOOVER
Represented By: STEVEN KAPUSTIN
Represented By: HARRIS J. CHERNOW
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COUNTYLINE TRANSMISSION, LLC
Represented By: HARRIS J. CHERNOW
Represented By: STEVEN KAPUSTIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.