STEWART v. WENEROWICZ et al
| EDWARD E. STEWART, III |
| MIKE WENEROWICZ and JOHN DOE(S) 1-4 |
| 2:2012cv04046 |
| July 16, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Favette |
| JAN E. DUBOIS |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
78
ORDER THAT COMMONWEALTH DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO THE EXTENT THAT IT ASSERTS AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSNES OF EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES UNDER THE PRISON LITIGATION REFORM ACT, RUNNING OF THE STATUE OF LIMIT ATIONS, AND QUALIFIED IMMUNITY; MEDICIAL DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO THE EXTENT THAT IT ASSERTS AS AN AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE THE RUNNING OF THE STATUE OF LIMITATIONS AND SEEKS DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS FO R PUNITIVE DAMAGES; COMMONWEALTH DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND MEDICAL DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISISS AS DENIED IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS; AND PLAINTIFF'S MOTION, NUNC PRO TUNC, FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE CERTIFICATES OF MERIT, UNOPPOSED BY DEFENDANTS IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 8/27/15. 8/28/15 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED TO COUNSEL.(jaa, )
|
|
Filing
77
MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 8/27/15. 8/28/15 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED TO COUNSEL.(jaa, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
