HENDERSON v. DELANEY et al
| DIONNE HENDERSON |
| GEORGE E. BRINKLEY, JOHN P. DELANEY, PAMELA P. DEMBE and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE OF PHILADELPHIA |
| 2:2012cv04265 |
| July 26, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Philadelphia |
| JAMES KNOLL GARDNER |
| Habeas Corpus: (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
ORDER THAT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ANGELL'S REPORT AND RECOMMEDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS RELIEF IS DENIED AND DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO REFILE AFTER EXHAUSTING HIS AVAILABLE STATE COUR T REMEDIES. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT BECAUSE PETITIONER HAS NOT MET STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS TO HAVE HIS CASE HEARD, AND NO REASONABLE JURIST COULD FIND THIS RULING DEBATABLE, AND BECAUSE PETITIONER FAILS TO DEMONSTRATE DENIAL OF A CONSTITUTIONAL RIG HT, A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL REMOVE THIS MATTER FROM CIVIL SUSPENSE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAMES KNOLL GARDNER ON 9/30/2014. 10/1/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PETITIONER AND E-MAILED.(lbs, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
