COLLURA v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
| JASON COLLURA |
| CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CEDRIC WHITE, JOSEPH CORVI, DANIEL DAVIS, MARIA ORTIZ-RODRIGUEZ, JERROLD BATES and ALLIED BARTON |
| 2:2012cv04398 |
| August 2, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Philadelphia |
| JAN E. DUBOIS |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
97
ORDER THAT PRO SE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR POSTPONEMENT OF NON JURISDICTIONAL HEARING IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM DATED 11/14/2013, PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 11/14/2013. 11/14/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(amas)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND TO COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 54 , IS DENIED. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DECLINE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION AND REMAND AND REPLY TO BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO REMAND 59 , IS DENIED. DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS PL AINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM 62 , IS GRANTED, AND ALL CLAIMS AGAINST ALLIED BARTON SECURITY SERVICES LLC, DANIEL ROSIELLO, AND DIANE KOWALSKI, ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. CITY DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 63 , IS DENIED IN PART AND GRANTED IN PART. FURTHER INFORMATION IS AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 7/31/2013. 8/1/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(amas)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER THAT PRO SE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (DOC. NO. 28), IS DENIED. THE REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL INCLUDED IN THE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION IS ALSO DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE MEMORANDUM DATED 1 2/20/2012, IS AMENDED SO AS TO CORRECT THE SENTENCE THAT BEGINS ON THE THIRD LINE OF PAGE 3 TO READ, "PLAINTIFF WAS NOT CHARGED WITH A CRIME AND WAS RELEASED". IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 36 ) IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO PLAINTIFF'S RIGHT TO FILE, WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS, A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WHICH COMPLIES IN ALL RESPECTS WITH THE MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DATED 12/20/2012 AND THE ATTACHED MEMORANDUM DATED 3/1/2013. IT IS FU RTHER ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STAY AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 37) IS DENIED AS MOOT. DEFENDANT'S MOTIONS TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NOS. 41 AND 43) ARE DENIED AS MOOT. PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO STAY OPP OSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR DISMISSAL (D0C. NO. 49) IS DENIED AS MOOT. PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO STRIKE (DOC. NO. 46) IS DENIED AS MOOT. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS (DOC. NO. 32) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 3/1/2013. 3/1/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(amas)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER THAT CITY DEFTS MOTION TO STRIKE IMPERTINENT AND SCANDALOUS ALLEGATIONS (DOC #16) IS GRANTED, ETC. THE ABOVE LISTED CLAIMS ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDUCE TO PLFF'S RIGHT TO INCLUDE THEM IN AN AMENDED COMPLAINT FILED WITHIN (30) DAYS, ETC. ( SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 12/20/12. ) 12/21/12 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, E-MAILED.(gn, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
