TERRY v. YEADON BOROUGH et al
| EVERETT K. TERRY |
| YEADON BOROUGH, BOROUGH COUNCIL YEADON BOROUGH, DOLORES JONES-BUTLER, ASHER KEMP, JR., JACK BYRNE, FLORENCE MCDONALD, JOHN HOLDEN, DEBORAH ROBINSON-HOWELL, DENISE STINSON and NELVA WRIGHT |
| 2:2012cv06205 |
| November 2, 2012 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Chester |
| CYNTHIA M. RUFE |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
ORDER THAT DEFTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFTS & AGAINST PLFF. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE COUNTERCLAIM OF DEFT YEADON BOROUGH IS DISMISSED AS MOOT. THE CLERK IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THE CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 8/19/15. 8/20/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER THAT DEFTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT IS GRANTED IN PART & DENIED IN PART. MOTION IS GRANTED AS TO YEADON BOROUGH & THE YEADON BOROUGH COUNCIL, & THE CLAIMS AGAINST THOSE DEFTS ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. MOTION IS DENIED AS TO THE INDIVIDUAL DEFTS. PLFF IS GRANTED LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT IN CONFORMITY WITH THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OPINION NO LATER THAN 1/6/2014, ETC.SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 12/13/13. 12/13/13 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
