DISTEFANO v. MACY'S RETAIL HOLDINGS, INC.
Plaintiff: DAVID DISTEFANO
Defendant: MACY'S RETAIL HOLDINGS, INC.
Case Number: 2:2012cv06745
Filed: December 3, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Montgomery
Presiding Judge: NORMA L. SHAPIRO
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER THAT DEFT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. PLFF'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE TESTIMONY IS DENIED AS MOOT.SIGNED BY HONORABLE NORMA L. SHAPIRO ON 3/31/14. 4/1/14 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DISTEFANO v. MACY'S RETAIL HOLDINGS, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DAVID DISTEFANO
Represented By: DAVID M. MACFARLAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MACY'S RETAIL HOLDINGS, INC.
Represented By: ANTHONY W. HINKLE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?