LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY v. 3039 B STREET ASSOCIATES, INC. et al
LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY |
3039 B STREET ASSOCIATES, INC. and INVESTORS TRUST LLC |
2:2012cv06810 |
December 5, 2012 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Outside the State of PA. |
JOEL H. SLOMSKY |
Contract: Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 63 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY [#35] ON INVESTORS TRUST LC'S COUNTERCLAIM IS DENIED. THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY [#35] ON ITS CROSSCLAIM AGAINST 3039 B STREET ASSOCIATES, INC. IS DENIED. THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INVESTORS TRUST LC [#39] ON ITS COUNTERCLAIM AGAINST LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY IS GRANTED. THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INVESTORS TRUST LC [#39] ON ITS CROSSCLAIM AGAINST 3039 B STREET ASSOCIATES, INC. IS GRANTED. THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF 3039 B STREET ASSOCIATES, INC. [#44] ON INVESTORS TRUST LC'S CROSSCLAIM IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 3/6/14. 3/6/14 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(fdc) |
Filing 41 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT MARC J. GROSSMAN ASSOCIATES' MOTION TO JOIN AS AN ADDITIONAL DEFENDANT (24) IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 10/10/13. 10/11/13 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.