BEY v. ROZUM et al
| BABAESU BEY |
| GERALD ROZUM, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MS. LINDA L. KELIY |
| 2:2013cv00325 |
| January 18, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Somerset |
| JOEL H. SLOMSKY |
| Habeas Corpus: (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABLILITY SHALL NOT ISSUE, IN THAT THE PETITIONER HAS NOT DEMONSTRATED THAT REASONABLE JURIS TS WOULD DEBATE THE CORRECTNESS OF THE PROCEDURAL GROUNDS FOR THIS RULING AND THE CLERK OF THE COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 9/27/16. 9/28/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PETITIONER, EMAILED TO COUNSEL AND COPY TO LEGAL.(jaa, )
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER THAT PETITIONER SHALL SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING ON OR BEFORE 7/13/15 WHY THE UNDERSIGNED SHOULD NOT RECOMMEND THAT HIS HABEAS PETITION BE DISMISSED AS UNTIMELY.. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE DAVID R. STRAWBRIDGE ON 6/11/15. 6/11/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL, 1 COPY TO LEGAL BIN.(pr, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
