VAUGHN v. RESOURCES FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, INC.

Justia Dockets & Filings Third Circuit Pennsylvania Eastern District VAUGHN v. RESOURCES FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, INC.

VAUGHN v. RESOURCES FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, INC.

Plaintiff:	MICHAEL VAUGHN
Defendant:	RESOURCES FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, INC.
Case Number:	2:2013cv00772
Filed:	February 12, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Philadelphia Office
County:	Philadelphia
Presiding Judge:	ROBERT F. KELLY
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Employment
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 13, 2014	Filing 33 ORDER THAT THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DOC. 21] IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. THE MOTION IS GRANTED AS TO PLAINTIFFS CLAIM FOR GENDER DISCRIMINATION UNDER TITLE VII AND THE PHRA. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT AND AGAIN ST PLAINTIFF ON PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM OF GENDER DISCRIMINATION UNDER TITLE VII AND THE PHRA. THE MOTION IS DENIED AS TO PLAINTIFFS CLAIM FOR RETALIATION UNDER TITLE VII AND THE PHRA. JURY SELECTION ON THE RETALIATION CLAIMS WILL COMMENCE ON W EDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 10, 2014 AT 9:30 A.M., AT THE U.S. COURTHOUSE, 601 MARKET STREET, PHILADELPHIA, PA. TRIAL WILL COMMENCE ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2014 AT 9:30 A.M.; AT THE READING STATION, THE MADISON BUILDING, 400 WASHINGTON STREET, READING, PA. PLAINTIFFS TRIAL SUBMISSIONS ARE DUE AUGUST 25, 2014. DEFENDANT'S TRIAL SUBMISSIONS ARE DUE SEPTEMBER 2, 2014. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 8/12/13. 8/13/14 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(er, )

Date Filed

Document Text

August 13, 2014

Filing 33 ORDER THAT THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DOC. 21] IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. THE MOTION IS GRANTED AS TO PLAINTIFFS CLAIM FOR GENDER DISCRIMINATION UNDER TITLE VII AND THE PHRA. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT AND AGAIN ST PLAINTIFF ON PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM OF GENDER DISCRIMINATION UNDER TITLE VII AND THE PHRA. THE MOTION IS DENIED AS TO PLAINTIFFS CLAIM FOR RETALIATION UNDER TITLE VII AND THE PHRA. JURY SELECTION ON THE RETALIATION CLAIMS WILL COMMENCE ON W EDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 10, 2014 AT 9:30 A.M., AT THE U.S. COURTHOUSE, 601 MARKET STREET, PHILADELPHIA, PA. TRIAL WILL COMMENCE ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2014 AT 9:30 A.M.; AT THE READING STATION, THE MADISON BUILDING, 400 WASHINGTON STREET, READING, PA. PLAINTIFFS TRIAL SUBMISSIONS ARE DUE AUGUST 25, 2014. DEFENDANT'S TRIAL SUBMISSIONS ARE DUE SEPTEMBER 2, 2014. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 8/12/13. 8/13/14 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(er, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: VAUGHN v. RESOURCES FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, INC.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: RESOURCES FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, INC.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: MICHAEL VAUGHN
Represented By:	ARI RISSON KARPF
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?