MALLARD v. LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA LOCAL UNION 57

Justia Dockets & Filings Third Circuit Pennsylvania Eastern District MALLARD v. LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA LOCAL UNION 57

MALLARD v. LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA LOCAL UNION 57

Plaintiff:	KENNETH MALLARD
Defendant:	LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA LOCAL UNION 57
Case Number:	2:2013cv00774
Filed:	February 12, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Philadelphia Office
County:	Philadelphia
Presiding Judge:	JOHN R. PADOVA
Nature of Suit:	Labor Litigations
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 28, 2014	Filing 35 ORDER THAT, AFTER CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANT LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA LOCAL UNION 57'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 31 , PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE 32 , AND DEFENDANT'S REPLY 33 , DEFENDANT'S MOTION IS GRANTED. JU DGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE TIMOTHY R. RICE ON 7/28/14. 7/29/14 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, ) (Main Document 35 replaced on 7/29/2014) (ti, ).
June 6, 2013	Filing 8 ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO REPLY 5 IS GRANTED. THE CLERK SHALL ENTER DEFENDANT'S REPLY BRIEF, WHICH IS ATTACHED TO THE MOTION AS EXHIBIT A, ON THE DOCKET. THE MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN R. PADOVA ON 6/6/13. 6/6/13 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )

Date Filed

Document Text

July 28, 2014

Filing 35 ORDER THAT, AFTER CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANT LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA LOCAL UNION 57'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 31 , PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE 32 , AND DEFENDANT'S REPLY 33 , DEFENDANT'S MOTION IS GRANTED. JU DGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE TIMOTHY R. RICE ON 7/28/14. 7/29/14 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, ) (Main Document 35 replaced on 7/29/2014) (ti, ).

June 6, 2013

Filing 8 ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO REPLY 5 IS GRANTED. THE CLERK SHALL ENTER DEFENDANT'S REPLY BRIEF, WHICH IS ATTACHED TO THE MOTION AS EXHIBIT A, ON THE DOCKET. THE MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN R. PADOVA ON 6/6/13. 6/6/13 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MALLARD v. LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA LOCAL UNION 57
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: KENNETH MALLARD
Represented By:	MICHAEL I. MCDERMOTT
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA LOCAL UNION 57
Represented By:	STEVEN J. BUSHINSKY
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?