LOMAX v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
| KEVIN LOMAX |
| CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, NUTTER, PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, CFCF, CORIZON, INC., PPS, DAVID DAVIS and CFCF MENTAL HEALTH DEPT. |
| 2:2013cv01078 |
| February 28, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Philadelphia |
| NORMA L. SHAPIRO |
| Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
OPINION/ORDER THAT CORIZON'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, ECF NO. 33 IS GRANTED SUCH THAT JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT CORIZON AND IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT DR. DAVID DAVIS AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF LOMAX. LOMAX'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY J UDGMENT, ECF NO. 40, IS DENIED. LOMAX'S CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MAYOR NUTTER, AND THE CFCF MENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. LOMAX IS PERMITTED LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH RESPECT TO H IS CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MAYOR NUTTER, AND THE CFCF MENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT NO LATER THAN APRIL 28, 2017. LOMAX IS ADVISED THAT IF HE FAILS TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT, THIS CASE WILL BE CLOSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 3/29/17. 3/30/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SES' AND E-MAILED.(ky, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
