MEIJER, INC. et al v. RECKITT BENCKISER, INC. et al
MEIJER DISTRIBUTION, INC. and MEIJER, INC. |
RECKITT BENCKISER PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., RECKITT BENCKISER LLC, RECKITT BENCKISER HEALTHCARE UK LTD., RECKITT BENCKISER, INC. and RECKITT BENCKISER GROUP PLC |
2:2013cv01122 |
March 1, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Outside the State of PA. |
MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG |
Other Statutes: Anti-Trust |
15 U.S.C. ยง 15 Antitrust Litigation |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS THE DIRECT PURCHASERS' COMPLAINT IS GRANTED AS TO COUNT III. THE MOTION IS FURTHER GRANTED IN THAT THE DIRECT PURCHASERS' CLAIMS AGAINST RECKITT BENCKISER, INC., RECKITT BENCKISER LLC, RECKITT BENCKISER HE ALTHCARE LTD. AND RECKITT BENCKISER GROUP PLC ARE DISMISSED. THE MOTION IS DENIED IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS. THE MOTION TO DISMISS THE END PAYORS' COMPLAINT IS GRANTED AS TO THE FOLLOWING CLAIMS OUTLINED HEREIN. THE MOTION IS FURTHER GRANTED IN THA T THE END PAYORS' CLAIMS AGAINST RECKITT BENCKISER, INC., RECKITT BENCKISER LLC AND RECKITT BENCKISER HEALTHCARE (UK) LTD. ARE DISMISSED. THE MOTION IS DENIED IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 12/3/2014. 12/3/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED. (SEE PAPER NO. 98 IN 13-MD-2445).(tjd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.