PRESTO QUALITY CARE CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
| PRESTO QUALITY CARE CORPORATION |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY |
| 2:2013cv01239 |
| March 7, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Outside the State of PA. |
| MICHAEL M. BAYLSON |
| Tax Suits: IRS-Third Party |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons |
| None |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: PRESTO QUALITY CARE CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: PRESTO QUALITY CARE CORPORATION | |
| Represented By: | JOSEPH R. VIOLA |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
