ANTELL v. FIRST NIAGRA BANK et al
| CHARLES ANTELL |
| CITIGROUP MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST, INC., HARLEYSVILLE NATIONAL BANK, CITIGROUP MORTGAGE LOAN SERVICES, FIRST NIAGRA BANK, CITIGROUP MORTGAGE INC., CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS REALTY CORP., CITIBANK, NA and US BANK, NA |
| 2:2013cv01482 |
| March 21, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Montgomery |
| CYNTHIA M. RUFE |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NO.33) IS DENIED AS MOOT; THE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE THE REVISED SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NO.36) IS DENIED AS FUTILE; THE AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NO.28) IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, EXCEPT WITH RESPECT TO PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND DECLARATORY JUDGMENT, WHICH ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, ETC. THE CASE REMAINS CLOSED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 4/7/2014. 4/8/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, E-MAILED. (kk, )
|
|
Filing
27
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT FOR THE REASONSNSTATED IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OPINION, THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL (DOC. NO.25) IS DISMISSED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 9/16/2013. 9/17/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND UNREP, E-MAILED. (kk, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
