EBERHARDT v. WENEROWITZ et al
ELLIOTT EBERHARDT |
MICHAEL WENEROWITZ, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA |
2:2013cv01700 |
April 1, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Montgomery |
JUAN R. SANCHEZ |
DAVID R. STRAWBRIDGE |
Habeas Corpus: (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 46 ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CORRECT THE ENTRY ON THE DOCKET (ECF NO.44) TO IDENTIFY THE MOTION AS A "MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT UNDER FED.R.CIV.P.60 (b)". THE MOTION IS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE. A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY IS DENIED; ETC.. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 1/14/22. 1/14/22 ENTERED AND NOT MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(JL) |
Filing 36 ORDER THAT PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED; RESPONDENTS OBJECTION DOCUMENT IS SUSTAINED; THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; THE AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED AND THERE IS NO SUBSTAN TIAL SHOWING OF THE DENIAL OF A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT REQUIRING THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY; THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 9/27/16. 9/27/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED. (jpd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.