METAL PARTNERS REBAR, LLC v. CARSON CONCRETE CORPORATION et al
| METAL PARTNERS REBAR, LLC |
| CARSON CONCRETE CORPORATION and ANTHONY J. SAMANGO, JR. |
| 2:2013cv03318 |
| June 1, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Outside the State of PA. |
| J. CURTIS JOYNER |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
MEMORANDUM ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS (DOC. NO. 41 ), IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF IS AWARDED THE ADDITIONAL SUM OF $66,612.28 IN ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS AND THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MOLD THE VERDICT PREVIOUSLY ENTERED TO INCLUDE THIS ADDITIONAL SUM FOR A TOTAL JUDGMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $213,850.66. SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. CURTIS JOYNER ON 7/15/2015. 7/15/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
|
|
Filing
34
DECISION ORDER THAT JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST DEFENDANTS, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY IN THE NET AMOUNT OF $147,238.38, ETC. IN THE EVENT PLAINTIFF WISHES TO OBTAIN PAYMENT FOR ITS ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COURT COSTS, IT IS DIRECTED TO SUBMIT A MOTION FOR SAME AND TO MOLD THE VERDICT ACCORDINGLY WITHIN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS OF THE ENTRY DATE OF THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. CURTIS JOYNER ON 5/6/2015. 5/6/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
