PORTER v. WETZEL et al
| FRED PORTER |
| JOHN E. WETZEL and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA |
| 2:2013cv03420 |
| June 17, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Huntingdon |
| JAMES KNOLL GARDNER |
| Habeas Corpus: (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE RUETER. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE PETITION FOR LEAVE OF THE COURT TO HOLD AEDPA HABEAS CORPUS PETITION IN ABEYANCE UNTIL EXHAUSTION ISSUE IF FULLY LITIGATED IN STATE COURT IS GRANTED . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS RELIEF IS STAYED AND ALL PROCEEDINGS ARE HELD IN ABEYANCE, ETC. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO RENEW HIS REQ UEST AFER THIS MATTER IS REMOVED FROM CIVIL SUSPENSE AND RETURNED TO ACTIVE STATUS. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL PLACE THIS MATTER IN CIVIL SUSPENSE UNTIL FURTHER ORDER OF COURT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PETITIONER SHALL NO TIFIY THE COURT WITHIN 45 DAYS FOLLOWING THE CONCLUSION OF HIS STATE COURT PROCEEDINGS. FAILURE TO DO SO MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THIS WITHIN PETITION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAMES KNOLL GARDNER ON 5/20/14. 5/21/14 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE', ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PA AND E-MAILED.(ky, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
