AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION v. THE FRISKNEY FAMILY TRUST, LLC et al
| AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION |
| THE FRISKNEY FAMILY TRUST, LLC, MEDVANTAGE PLUS, LLC and ROBERT L. FRISKNEY |
| MEDVANTAGE PLUS, LLC, THE FRISKNEY FAMILY TRUST, LLC and ROBERT L. FRISKNEY |
| AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION |
| 2:2013cv03720 |
| June 27, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Outside the State of PA. |
| MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG |
| Property Rights: Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 44 Trademark Infringement |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
93
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON DEFENDANTS' COUNTERCLAIMS [#53] IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF ON DEFENDANTS' COUNTERCLAIMS FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT (COUNT I) AND REVERSE DOMAIN NAME HIJACKING (COUNT II). DEFENDANTS' ROBERT FRISKNEY AND THE FRISKNEY FAMILY TRUST, LLC'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON LIABILITY [#62] IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. THE MOTION IS GRANTED SUCH THAT JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF ROBERT FRISKNEY AND THE FRISKNEY FAMILY TRUST, LLC ON PLAINTIFF'S COMMON LAW UNFAIR COMPETITION CLAIM (COUNT V). THE MOTION IS DENIED IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS. IN LIGHT OF THIS COURT'S ENTRY OF JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF ON DEFENDANTS&# 039; BREACH OF CONTRACT COUNTERCLAIM (COUNT I), AND PURSUANT TO FRCP 56(f)(1), WHICH STATES THAT "[A]FTER GIVING NOTICE AND A REASONABLE TIME TO RESPOND, THE COURT MAY...GRANT SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR A NONMOVANT," DEFENDANTS ROBERT FRISKNEY AN D THE FRISKNEY FAMILY TRUST, LLC, SHALL, WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, SHOW CAUSE AS TO WHY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF ON ITS BREACH OF CONTRACT CLAIM (COUNT I) SHOULD NOT BE ENTERED. DEFENDANT MEDVANTAGE PLUS, LLC'S M OTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [#68] IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. THE MOTION IS GRANTED SUCH THAT JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF MEDVANTAGE ON PLAINTIFF'S COMMON LAW UNFAIR COMPETITION CLAIM (COUNT V). THE MOTION IS DENIED IN ALL OTHER RE SPECTS. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IN LIMINE [#79] IS DENIED AS MOOT. DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A POST-ARGUMENT MEMORANDUM [#89] IS DENIED FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THIS COURT'S ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OPINION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 4/6/16. 4/6/16 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
