EVANS v. LAMAS et al
| KENNETH R. EVANS |
| MARIROSA LAMAS, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA, JOHN E. WETZEL and MICHAEL WENEROWICZ |
| 2:2013cv03723 |
| June 26, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Delaware |
| PAUL S. DIAMOND |
| Habeas Corpus: (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
ORDER THAT THE SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. NO. 31) IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (DOC. NO. 1) IS DISMISSED AS MOOT; A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHALL NOT ISSUE; THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS ACTION.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 1/29/18. 1/31/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, )
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL PLACE THIS MATTER IN CIVIL SUSPENSE PENDING THE CONCLUSION OF STATE COURT PROCEEDINGS; RESPONDENTS SHALL FILE A STATUS REPORT WITH THE COURT EVERY THIRTY (30) DAYS UNTIL PETITIONER HAS BEEN RESENTENCED OR THE STATE COURT PROCEEDINGS OTHERWISE CONCLUDE.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 2/26/16. 2/26/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
