PEROCIER v. THE CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDING BISHIPS OF THE CHURCH OF LATTER DAY SAINTS
| FELIX PEROCIER |
| THE CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDING BISHIPS OF THE CHURCH OF LATTER DAY SAINTS |
| 2:2013cv04399 |
| July 30, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Philadelphia |
| L. FELIPE RESTREPO |
| P.I.: Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability |
| Defendant |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: PEROCIER v. THE CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDING BISHIPS OF THE CHURCH OF LATTER DAY SAINTS | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: FELIX PEROCIER | |
| Represented By: | ROLAND B. JARVIS |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: THE CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDING BISHIPS OF THE CHURCH OF LATTER DAY SAINTS | |
| Represented By: | DANIEL J. KAIN |
| Represented By: | CHARLES SCOTT TOOMEY |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
