BURGOS v. NUTTER et al
DAVID BURGOS |
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and JOHN DELANEY |
2:2013cv04894 |
August 20, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Philadelphia |
NORMA L. SHAPIRO |
Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 122 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT CITY DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. CORIZON'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN. BURGOS' MOTION FOR SANCTIONS IS GRANTED. HEREBY ORDERED THAT T HIS CASE IS REFERRED TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE CAROL SANDRA MOORE WELLS FOR REPORT AND RECOMMENDAITON ON THE SANCTIONS TO BE IMPOSED. THE PARTIES SHALL REPORT TO THE UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE, 601 MARKET STREET, COURTROOM 3F ON 2/24/20 AT 2:00PM. PLAINTIFF DAVID BURGOS INMATE #LJ5951 SHALL PARTICIPATE BY VIDEOCONFERENCE TO BE ARRANGED WITH THE APPROPRIATE AUTHORITIES AT SCI RETREAT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 2/11/20. 2/12/20 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rf, ) |
Filing 72 ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE PENDING MOTIONS AND RESPONSES, THE MOTION TO DISMISS OF DEFENDANTS THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JOHN DELANEY, LOUIS GIORLA, MICHELE FARRELL 46 IS DISMISSED AS MOOT. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO FILE THE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT 53 IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS FOLLOWS: THE CLERK SHALL FILE THE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT. PLAINTIFF MAY PROCEED WITH THE TRIPLE-CELLING CLAIM UNDER DUE PROCESS CLAUSE OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT AGAINST DEFENDANTS DELANEY, F ARRELL, GIORLA, AND THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA. ALL CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT MICHAEL NUTTER ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. ALL REMAINING DEFENDANTS EXCEPT CORIZON SHALL FILE AN ANSWER TO THE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN 14 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORD ER. CORIZON SHALL FILE ANY MOTION TO DISMISS NO LATER THAN 10 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL COUNSEL 56 IS GRANTED. THE CLERK IS DIRECTED TO REFER THIS CASE TO THE PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS PANEL. I N THE MEANTIME, THIS CASE SHALL REMAIN IN ACTIVE STATUS. PLAINTIFF'S OMNIBUS RESPOSNE AND CLARIFICATION MOTION 57 IS DISMISSED AS MOOT. PLAITNIFF'S DISCOVERY MOTION 62 IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DEPOSE 67 IS GRANTED, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 9/6/17. 9/7/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(ti, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.