AZILLE v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
Plaintiff: PETER FITZROY THOMAS AZILLE
Defendant: ANY AND ALL PARTIES WHO COMMITED FRAUDULANT WORK OR ACTIVITY ON COURT DOCKET CP-51-CR 0008383-2013, DAVID CROSS, CFCF PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEMS and COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case Number: 2:2013cv05448
Filed: September 13, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Outside the State of PA.
Presiding Judge: JOEL H. SLOMSKY
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER THAT THE DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE IS GRANTED AND THE CLERK OF COURT IS ORDERED TO CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 12/4/14. 12/5/14 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND EMAILED TO COUNSEL.(jaa, )
March 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER THAT LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPIERIS IS GRANTED. PETITIONER SHALL PAY THE $350.00 FILING FEE. PETITIONER'S CLAIMS AGAINST DAVID CROSS, ESQ., AND THE PHILADELPHIA COMMON PLEAS COURT TRIAL DIVISION ARE DISMISSED. THE AMENDED COMPLAI NT IS TO BE FILED AGAINST THE REMAINING DEFENDANTS, THE SUMMONSES ARE TO ISSUE AND SERVICE OF THE SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT IS TO BE MADE UPON THE DEFENDANTS BY THE U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO SEND A COPY OF THIS ORDER TO THE WARDEN OF PHILADELPHIA DETENTION CENTER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 3/27/14. 3/27/14 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED LTO PRO SE PETITIONER AND FAXED TO WARDEN PHILADELPHIA DETENTION CENTER. (jpd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: AZILLE v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANY AND ALL PARTIES WHO COMMITED FRAUDULANT WORK OR ACTIVITY ON COURT DOCKET CP-51-CR 0008383-2013
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DAVID CROSS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CFCF PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEMS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PETER FITZROY THOMAS AZILLE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?