DRUMMOND v. HERR FOODS INC. et al
KALVIN DRUMMOND, MOHAMMED BAH, SHANE BENT and CHRISTOPHER GRANDISON |
HERR FOODS INC. and JOHN DOES 1-10 |
2:2013cv05991 |
October 14, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Philadelphia |
BERLE M. SCHILLER |
Fair Labor Standards Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 95 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO CERTIFY CONDITIONAL COLLECTIVE ACTION (DOC. 77) IS GRANTED. MATTER IS CONDITIONALLY CERTIFIED AS A COLLECTIVE ACTION PURSUANT TO THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT ON BEHALF OF ALL INDIVIDUALS WHO HAVE BEEN EMPLOYED BY DEFENDANT AS ROUTE SALESPERSONS IN THE 3 YEARS PRECEDING THE FILING OF PLAINTIFFS INITIAL COMPLAINT, ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE BERLE M. SCHILLER ON 3/2/15. 3/3/15 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, ) |
Filing 75 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS AMENDED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 61) IS DENIED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE BERLE M. SCHILLER ON 10/21/14. 10/21/14 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, ) |
Filing 23 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. 9) IS GRANTED. COUNT III OF PLAINTIFFS AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED. PLAINTIFFS MAY FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS COURTS MEMORANDUM. IF ELECT TO DO SO, SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT SHALL BE FILED ON OR BEFORE 1/27/14. SIGNED BY HONORABLE BERLE M. SCHILLER ON 1/9/14. 1/9/14 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.