DORMAN PRODUCTS, INC. v. PACCAR, INC.
Plaintiff: DORMAN PRODUCTS, INC.
Defendant: PACCAR, INC.
Counter_claimant: PACCAR, INC.
Counter_defendant: DORMAN PRODUCTS, INC.
Case Number: 2:2013cv06383
Filed: November 1, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Philadelphia
Presiding Judge: JAN E. DUBOIS
Nature of Suit: Property Rights: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 20, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 185 ORDER THAT DORMAN PRODUCTS, INC.'S MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 12/20/2016. 12/21/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )
August 23, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 153 ORDER THAT DORMAN'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. PACCAR'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. DORMAN'S DAUBERT MOTION IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. THE PART OF DORMAN'S MOTION THAT SEEKS TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF JOHN D. BLUMENSTEIN IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. PACCAR'S DAUBERT MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF MICHAEL NRANIAN IS GRANTED IN PART, DENIED IN PART AS MOOT, DENIED IN PART.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 8/22/2016. 8/23/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )
June 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF DORMAN PRODUCTS, INC.'S MOTION TO STAY IS HEREBY GRANTED, AND THE CASE SHALL BE CLOSED AND TRANSFERRED TO THE CIVIL SUSPENSE FILE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE PARTIES SHALL JOINTLY REPORT TO THE COURT REGARDING THE STATUS OF THE PROCEEDINGS AT THREE MONTH INTERVALS AS OUTLINED HEREIN. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT DEFENDANT PACCAR INC'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 6/16/2014. 6/16/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DORMAN PRODUCTS, INC. v. PACCAR, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DORMAN PRODUCTS, INC.
Represented By: ANTHONY S. VOLPE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PACCAR, INC.
Represented By: JAMES W. ANABLE
Represented By: STANLEY H. COHEN
Represented By: JOHN D. DENKENBERGER
Represented By: BRIAN F. MCMAHON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_claimant: PACCAR, INC.
Represented By: STANLEY H. COHEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: DORMAN PRODUCTS, INC.
Represented By: ANTHONY S. VOLPE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?