VANGOETHEM v. LAWTON et al
| PATRICK VANGOETHEM |
| WILLIAM LAWTON, MICHELE FARRELL and KAREN BRYANT |
| 2:2013cv06696 |
| November 18, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Philadelphia |
| NORMA L. SHAPIRO |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
OPINION/ORDER THAT DEFENDANT LAWTON'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT WILL BE GRANTED AND DEFENDANT LAWTON IS DISMISSED FROM THIS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE; THE AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANT CO RIZON MEDICAL DIRECTOR; PLAINTIFF SHALL FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT IN THIRTY (30) DAYS AS TO CORIZON MEDICAL DIRECTOR ONLY, IF HE CAN DO SO IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 3/20/15. 3/20/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE' AND E-MAILED.(ky, )
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED PLFF IS GIVEN LEAVE TO FILE AND SERVE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT IWTHIN 45 DAYS OF THIS ORDER. IF AN AMENDED COMPLAINT IS FILED, DEFTS SHALL FILE AND SERVE THEIR RESPONSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FEDERAL AND LOCAL RULES OF THIS COURT.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NORMA L. SHAPIRO ON 8/5/14. 8/6/14 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND LEGAL, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(lvj, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
