SWINSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
LYDELL SWINSON |
WIALLIAMS, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA FIRE DEPARTMENT and LINDELL SWINSON, SR. |
2:2013cv06870 |
November 26, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Philadelphia |
HARVEY BARTLE |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 91 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THE MOTION OF PLAINTIFF LINDELL SWINSON, JR., FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT CITY OF PHILADELPHIA AS TO LIABILITY [#86] IS GRANTED; AND THE MOTION OF DEFENDANT CITY OF PHILADELPHIA FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST PLAINTIFF LINDELL SWINSON, JR., [#87] IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 4/7/16. 4/7/16 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc) |
Filing 67 ORDER THAT THE MOTION OF DEFENDANT CITY OF PHILADELPHIA AND MICHAEL CURRAN TO DISMISS COUNT IV OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC.NO.54) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 12/3/15. 12/4/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jpd, ) |
Filing 50 ORDER THAT THE MOTION OF DEFENDANTS THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA AND MICHAEL CURRAN FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 44) IS GRANTED AS TO THE CLAIMS OF PLAINTIFF LYDELL SWINSON, JR. UNDER 42 U.S.C. 1983. THE MOTION OF DEFENDANT CITY OF PHIALDELPHIA FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE STATE LAW CLAIM OF PLAINTIFF IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 8/19/15. 8/20/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (jpd) Modified on 8/20/2015 (lisad, ). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.