CURTIS v. WETZEL et al
| WILLIAM CURTIS |
| JOHN WETZEL, KLOPOTOSKI, ROBIN M. LEWIS, MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, JAY LANE, FRANCIS FEILD, GARY OLINGER, T. BOLTON, FRANK REGAN, J. BIRMINGHAM, BRANNER, GERARD KELLY, STEWART and WENDY SHAYLOR |
| 2:2014cv00786 |
| February 3, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Montgomery |
| LAWRENCE F. STENGEL |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
240
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR RELIEF OF ORDER PURSUANT TO RULE 60 IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR AN ORDER OF REMAND FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS IS DENIED AS MOOT. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION SEEKING AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A REPLY TO BIS RULE 60 MOTION IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE BERLE M. SCHILLER ON 10/3/23. 10/3/23 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(mbh) Modified on 10/3/2023 (fb).
|
|
Filing
227
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S PRO SE MOTION TO SUBMIT RELEVANT EVIDENCE AND HIS MOTION TO SUBMIT RELEVANT EVIDENCE PERTAINING TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT ARE GRANTED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL AMEND THE DOCKET TO APPROPRIATELY REFLECT THAT THE DOCUMENT AT ECF 2 10 IS PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION AT ECF 194. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR AN ORDER AND SECOND MOTION FOR DEFENDANTS TO PROVIDE REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS ARE DENIED AS MOOT. THE DOCUMENT FILED ECF 212 SHALL BE STRIC KEN FROM THE DOCKET. CURTIS'S MOTION TO AMEND THE CAPTION IS DISMISSED AS MOOT. DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST CURTIS. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE BERLE M. SCHILLER ON 6/12/23. 6/13/23 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED. (mbh)
|
|
Filing
119
ORDER THAT THE DEFENDANTS' MOTION IS GRANTED IN ITS ENTIRETY. THE PLAINTIFF'S CROSS-MOTION IS DENIED IN ITS ENTIRETY. PURSUANT TO RULE 58 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENETED ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR ALL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 3/29/17. 3/29/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(ti, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
