WALKER v. THE CITY OF COATESVILLE
| HARRY G. WALKER, III |
| THE CITY OF COATESVILLE |
| 2:2014cv00853 |
| February 10, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Chester |
| EDUARDO C. ROBRENO |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD A. MCHUGH ON 11/26/2014. 11/26/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: WALKER v. THE CITY OF COATESVILLE | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: THE CITY OF COATESVILLE | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: HARRY G. WALKER, III | |
| Represented By: | MARK S. SCHEFFER |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
