WATKINS v. ITM RECORDS et al
| JAMES WATKINS |
| ITM RECORDS, AMAZON.COM, INC., RELATIVITY MEDIA, LLC, BURN DIRECT, ULLI BLOBEL, WEST WIND PUBLISHING, CARUS-VERLAG GmbH & Co KG, TRANS WORLD ENTERNTAINMENT CORP, ZINK MEDIA, INC., ALL MEDIA NETWORK, LLC, AOL,INC., WAL-MART STORES, INC., CADNOR LTD. and TOWER RECORDS, INC. |
| 2:2014cv01049 |
| February 20, 2014 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Philadelphia |
| JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL |
| Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
130
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT TRANS WORLD ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT ATTORNEYS AND COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $13,650.00 ARE AWARDED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT TRANS WORLD ENTERETAINMENT AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF JAMES WATKINS. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE RICHARD A. LLORET ON 9/23/2015. 9/23/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )
|
|
Filing
119
ORDER THAT DISCOVERY BETWEEN TWE AND THE PLAINTIFF IS STAYED. TWE'S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 96 ) IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF SHALL HAVE 14 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER TO RE-FILE HIS COMPLAINT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS OPINION. TWE'S REQUEST TO CONVERT ITS MOTION TO IDMSISS THE COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 95 ) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE RICHARD A. LLORET ON 7/23/2015. 7/24/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(sg, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
